I wish that I could use a stronger password for this site. 8 characters are NOT enough.
Response (Gaurav Sharma) 02/06/2010 05:53 AM
Thank you for your email regarding your online password.
I would like to inform you that our website has a 128 bit encryption. With this base, passwords that comprise only of letters and alphabets create an algorithm that is difficult to crack. We discourage the use of special characters because hacking softwares can recognize them very easily.
The length of the password is limited to 8 characters to reduce keyboard contact. Some softwares can decipher a password based on the information of “most common keys pressed”.
Therefore, lesser keys punched in a given frame of time lessen the possibility of the password being cracked.
Moreover, American Express is committed to protecting the privacy and security of all of our Cardmembers, both on-line and off-line. We believe that our current security measures, which include our sophisticated monitoring systems to detect unusual or fraudulent card activity, provide strong, ongoing protections for our Cardmembers.
Rest assured, I have forwarded your comments to our webmaster for review. During this review, we may contact you if additional information is required.
We value your membership and wish goodness and health to you and your family.Sincerely,
Gaurav Sharma
Email Servicing Team
American Express Interactive Services
O_o
-
romeojulietsierra liked this
-
supafamous reblogged this from ataferner
-
starpointe reblogged this from ataferner and added:
Are you kidding me? Where did...guy learn about online security?!
-
2arrs2ells liked this
-
edf liked this
-
webmarc reblogged this from marco and added:
While few things in life are ever complete, this does fall into the category of complete BS. Taken
-
ataferner liked this
-
chrismear liked this
-
cowsandmilk reblogged this from marco and added:
I’ll skip out on commenting on the American Express response, but the idea that you can’t have an 8 character...
-
herrstucki liked this
-
christopherattle reblogged this from lkm and added:
This guy needs two things, fast, in whichever order is easiest: sodium pentathol cockpunch
-
jonathaneunice liked this
-
a-interest reblogged this from marco and added:
Yes, that is utter bullshit. I reckon the reason is that their password hash algorithm probably ignores everything after...
-
collectedwisdom liked this
-
redcloud liked this
-
twistmac reblogged this from marco
-
smartasshat liked this
-
steelopus liked this
-
nikf liked this
-
lkm reblogged this from ataferner and added:
O_o Translation from technobullshit to human: “I’m high as...kite.” Seriously. None...
-
nicksummers liked this
-
coyotesqrl liked this
-
berezina liked this
-
guillee liked this
-
jerryyeti liked this
-
toldorknown reblogged this from marco and added:
It’s a crock. As I’m sure you know, encrypted characters are all equally easy to decrypt, which is to say virtually...
-
tristn liked this
-
cwj liked this
-
david liked this
-
lucas liked this
-
fowkswe reblogged this from marco and added:
Always wondered this myself. It seems...a weak security measure for a major financial...
-
strake liked this
-
warszawaaa liked this
-
marco reblogged this from iamdanw
-
zerolab reblogged this from ataferner
-
iamdanw reblogged this from ataferner
-
travs liked this
-
janhapke reblogged this from ataferner
-
stammy reblogged this from ataferner and added:
FAILLLLLLLLLLLLL
-
enlavin reblogged this from ataferner
-
scott-jackson liked this
-
makenosound liked this
-
icepack liked this
-
jessta reblogged this from ataferner and added:
easily enough, alphanumeric, that’s 32^8 = 1099511627776 You can’t brute force that without getting noticed. But still...
-
biiaru liked this
-
cesarsalazar liked this
-
favstar liked this
-
spencerfry liked this
-
200 liked this
-
idiosyncratic-routine reblogged this from ataferner and added:
That, my dear, is the craziest fucking thing I’ve ever heard.
-
ataferner posted this
